The Afghan Energy Project

Links to Articles and News

Links to interesting articles

  1. Robbie Gennet: Afghanistan's Biofuel Revolution 

    Seeing the news that President Obama is sending more troops into Afghanistan, our gaze turns from Iraq to the place where the Taliban has made a resurgence ...
    www.huffingtonpost.com/.../afghanistans-biofuel-revo_b_168399.html - Cached - Similar
    ?
  2. Can biofuels beat drugs crops and save lives in Afghanistan? - CNN.com 

    Sep 16, 2010 ... Among environmentalists, biofuels are almost as divisive an issue as NATO military operations in Afghanistan are in wider public ...
    www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/.../afghanistan.biofuel.eco/index.html - Cached
  3. Can Afghanistan's Poppies Be Converted into Biofuel? « The Dirt 

    Aug 10, 2010 ... The idea of expanding biofuels in Afghanistan has been batted around for a while. Last year, The Huffington Post said the U.S. could buy all ...
    dirt.asla.org/.../can-afghanistans-poppies-be-converted-into-biofuel/ - Cached
  4. Pajamas Media » Afghanistan Should Grow Fuel, Not Drugs 

    Jun 18, 2008 ... What if Afghanistan's farmers could be persuaded to stop growing opium poppies and produce crops for biofuels instead? ...
    pajamasmedia.com/blog/afghanistan-should-grow-fuel-not-drugs/ - Cached
  5. Can biofuels beat drugs crops and save lives in Afghanistan? 

    Sep 20, 2010 ... By Dean Irvine, CNN : | Among environmentalists, biofuels are almost as divisive ...
    www.surgar.net/english/index.php?mod=news&pg...From... - Cached
  6. Afghanistan: Can biofuels fuel the 'War on Terror'? | Asian ... 

    Sep 27, 2010 ... It may sound illogical to produce biofuels in the Middle East, a region generally associated with oil. It may sound even stranger to ship ...
    asiancorrespondent.com/.../afghanistan-can-biofuels-fuel-the-‘war-on-terror’ - Cached
  7. Opium poppies as biofuels feedstock for Afghanistan : Biofuels ... 

    Sep 20, 2010 ... The world's most widely-read biofuels daily - biofuels, biodiesel, ethanol, algae, jatropha, green gasoline, green diesel, and biocrude ...
    biofuelsdigest.com/.../opium-poppies-as-biofuels-feedstock-for-afghanistan/ - Cached
  8. Biofuels in Afghanistan to combat opium farming? 

    bioenergy trade, bio-energy, sustainable development, biofuels, biodiesel, ethanol.
    news.mongabay.com/.../09/biofuels-in-afghanistan-to-combat.html - Cached
  9. Jordan Direction Can biofuels save lives in Afghanistan | business 

    Sep 19, 2010 ... Yet two American businessmen believe that home-grown biofuel in Afghanistan could be a "green" solution to some of the larger problems the ...
    jordandirections.com/business/can-biofuels-save-lives-in-afghanistan - Cached
  10. Biofuel Maker Sets IPO Price (CDXS, PALG, SNY) - Silobreaker 

    The production and use of biofuels in Afghanistan would benefit the country, two entrepreneurs said in a white paper. Producing biofuels in Afghanistan ...
    www.silobreaker.com/biofuel-maker-sets-ipo-price-cdxs-palg-sny-5_2263724180581122048 -
The News


December 9th, 2011

By Peter Bell

This article discusses an idea how a crash program can be rolled out to locally produce an algae derived, “drop in”, liquid fuel in Afghanistan, to reduce the US military’s reliance on physically and politically vulnerable truck convoys, delivering essential fuel supplies through neighboring countries. The fully burdened cost of fuel at the frontline can be as high as $500 per gallon so being able to deploy with the capability to produce its own fuel not only ensures supply availability and reduced supply convoy personnel risk for the US military, but is more economically sustainable.


U.S.'s Afghan Headache: $400-a-Gallon Gasoline

OVER EASTERN AFGHANISTAN—Parachuting a barrel of fuel to a remote Afghan base takes sharp flying skills, steady nerves and flawless timing.

It also costs a lot of money—up to $400 a gallon, by military estimates.

But the Pentagon is stuck with the expense for the foreseeable future, especially given the recent deterioration in U.S.-Pakistani relations.


In the article's comments section:

My son works out of a Combat Outpost in RC East (between Kabul and the Pak border) One of his e-mails: Dad: " watched 8 55gal drums of JP-4 airdropped, reach term vel, and burst when they hit the ground" . Next week: " Plane comes over at approx 10k ft, chutes come out in a string, man, then group together and all land in the drop zone, COOL" They were $90K GPS guided chutes. There load :water and energy drinks. To the troops more needed than fuel.

Idiots! Why don't they just buy bio-fuels from the Afghans? Apparently the Afghanis already produce fuel products in abundance at far lower costs--Poppies! Poppies can deliver fuel to bases at a mere cost of $10 per gallon versus $400 per gallon. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/03/putting-poppies-in-the-gas-tank/8379/ Typical stupidity.

The Military Is Going Green. It Has To.

October 5, 2010

by JJ Sutherland

Aaron Favila/AP

Pakistani police officer stands guard on still smoldering oil trucks in Shikarpur, southern Pakistan on Friday Oct. 1, 2010.

The images of burning fuel trucks that were carrying fuel destined to NATO forces in Afghanistan brings home just how dependent the US military is on fossil fuels, and how fragile that supply line can be. The military has been trying to reduce its reliance on gas for a few years now. As the New York Times reports this morning it has become a strategic necessity.

“There are a lot of profound reasons for doing this, but for us at the core it’s practical,” said Ray Mabus, the Navy secretary and a former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, who has said he wants 50 percent of the power for the Navy and Marines to come from renewable energy sources by 2020. That figure includes energy for bases as well as fuel for cars and ships.

“Fossil fuel is the No. 1 thing we import to Afghanistan,” Mr. Mabus said, “and guarding that fuel is keeping the troops from doing what they were sent there to do, to fight or engage local people.”

Those massive fuel convoys have a cost that can be measured in lives. One Army study showed that for every 24 convoys that moved, one person lost their life.

The importance of reducing dependence on fossil fuels is being felt in every branch of the military. For the past few months the Air Force has been testing biofuels in aircraft. And not just slow transports, they want to certify the whole fleet, up to and including the F-22 Raptor to fly with renewable fuels.

Alternative energy makes sense for far-flung military
Monday, October 25, 2010
McCook Daily Gazette
It may be the ultimate irony that the same military that has gone to war over fossil fuel over the years may help kill the need to fight for oil.

The New York Times reported that the fuel the military buys for a little over $1 a gallon costs $400 to deliver to some forward operating bases.

At that rate, you don't have to be a tree-hugger to appreciate the value of generating power from solar panels or wind on-site.

Not only is hauling fuel expensive, tanker trucks on their way to Afghanistan make tempting targets for insurgents. According to one army study, for every 24 fuel convoys sent out, one soldier or civilian involved in moving the fuel is killed.

One Marine company recently arrived in the Helmand Province with portable solar panels, energy conserving lights, solar tent shields and solar chargers for computers and communications equipment. That all translates into diesel fuel that won't have to be hauled thousands of miles.

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus wants half of the power for the Navy and Marines to come from renewable energy sources by 2020, including bases as well as fuel for cars and ships.

The Navy's first hybrid vessel, a Wasp-class amphibious assault ship named the U.S.S. Makin Island, was launched last year. By running under 10 knots on electricity rather than fossil fuel, it saved 900,000 gallons of fuel on its maiden voyage from Mississippi to San Diego, compared with a conventional ship its size.

The Air Force is getting into the act, expecting to have its entire fleet certified to fly on biofuels by 2011, and has already flown test flights using a 50-50 mix of plant-based biofuel and jet fuel. The Navy started using fuel made from algae this summer. There is even a chance, officials say, the fuel could be produced near battlefields wherever the raw materials, like plants, are available.

Nebraskans, especially, should be interested in alternative energy, both because of the cost of delivering conventional energy to remote areas, and because we are in a position to be a leader in the production of alternative energy from solar, wind and biofuels.

Sadly, much of the technology we count on in modern life is a result of war -- jet engines and nuclear power, just to name two -- so we shouldn't be surprised if war gives alternative energy the kick start it needs to come into widespread use.

Let's hope today's military investment in wind, solar and biofuels helps make tomorrow's energy wars unnecessary.

© Copyright 2010 McCook Daily Gazette. All rights reserved.